Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Stop chasing suppliers across messy email threads! Automate professional requests to your suppliers.
| RtsFlow ‑ Request to Supplier | Track by Loop | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Provide self-serve order tracking and real time estimated delivery dates for better CX
| Metric | RtsFlow ‑ Request to Supplier | Track by Loop |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 76 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free plan available | From $99/month |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 5 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2026 | Oct 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, Track by Loop is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.3★ vs RtsFlow ‑ Request to Supplier's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, RtsFlow ‑ Request to Supplier offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Track by Loop starts at From $99/month. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Track by Loop; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — RtsFlow ‑ Request to Supplier's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Track by Loop's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: RtsFlow ‑ Request to Supplier audit • Track by Loop audit
| Keyword | RtsFlow ‑ Request to Supplier | Track by Loop |
|---|---|---|
| staff notification | Not ranked | #10 |
| staff | Not ranked | #12 |
| notifications | Not ranked | #23 |
No tracked changes.
RtsFlow ‑ Request to Supplier is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Track by Loop starts at From $99/month. Both publish their pricing on the Shopify App Store; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Track by Loop does carry the larger published review base (76 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Track by Loop has the deeper published review base (76 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
RtsFlow ‑ Request to Supplier typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Track by Loop typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (76 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. RtsFlow ‑ Request to Supplier and Track by Loop both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from RtsFlow ‑ Request to Supplier" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.