GG Product Page Image Slider vs Like2Have.it

Like2Have.it edges out GG Product Page Image Slider on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: GG Product Page Image Slider at Free plan available, Like2Have.it at Free trial available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

GG Product Page Image Slider has the larger user base (178 reviews vs 14), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Like2Have.it's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Like2Have.it; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — GG Product Page Image Slider's 178-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Like2Have.it's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is GG Product Page Image Slider or Like2Have.it cheaper?

Both GG Product Page Image Slider and Like2Have.it offer paid plans only. GG Product Page Image Slider starts at Free plan available; Like2Have.it starts at Free trial available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, GG Product Page Image Slider or Like2Have.it?

Like2Have.it has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 14 reviews) compared to GG Product Page Image Slider (4.8★ from 178 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose GG Product Page Image Slider or Like2Have.it?

Like2Have.it holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, GG Product Page Image Slider or Like2Have.it?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. GG Product Page Image Slider has the deeper published review base (178 vs 14), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Shopify App Store merchants?

GG Product Page Image Slider typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (178 reviews). Like2Have.it typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (14 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between GG Product Page Image Slider and Like2Have.it?

Migration support varies by app and category. GG Product Page Image Slider and Like2Have.it both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Like2Have.it" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.