Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Go beyond themes—create conversion-ready landing & product pages fast, no coding required.
| PageFly Landing Page Builder | PODpartner | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Where creativity meets quality - Your go-to print-on-demand clothing specialist.
| Metric | PageFly Landing Page Builder | PODpartner: Print on Demand |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 5.6k | 29 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free to install |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 7 | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 26 new | — |
| Languages | 9 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2017 | Jan 2022 |
PageFly Landing Page Builder and PODpartner: Print on Demand are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: PageFly Landing Page Builder at Free plan available, PODpartner: Print on Demand at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. PageFly Landing Page Builder has the larger user base (5,614 reviews vs 29), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. PODpartner: Print on Demand's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: PageFly Landing Page Builder audit • PODpartner: Print on Demand audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | PageFly Landing Page Builder | PODpartner |
|---|---|---|
| page | #1 | Not ranked |
| landing pages | #2 | Not ranked |
| landing page builder | #3 | Not ranked |
| on demand | Not ranked | #5 |
| demand | Not ranked | #6 |
Not featured in any section recently.
| Signal | PageFly Landing Page Builder | PODpartner |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (5.6k) | 4.9 ★ (29) |
| Rating distribution | 594% 42% 31% 21% 13% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +5 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +26 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +109 | — |
Both PageFly Landing Page Builder and PODpartner: Print on Demand offer paid plans only. PageFly Landing Page Builder starts at Free plan available; PODpartner: Print on Demand starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
PageFly Landing Page Builder (4.9★, 5,614 reviews) and PODpartner: Print on Demand (4.9★, 29 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. PageFly Landing Page Builder fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; PODpartner: Print on Demand is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. PageFly Landing Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,614 reviews vs 29), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
PageFly Landing Page Builder typically suits established stores with steady traffic based on its review-base composition (5,614 reviews). PODpartner: Print on Demand aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (29 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Mahedi, was so helpful. I have been having some difficulty with figuring out how to navigate the app and he came in and assisted me with figuring out how to answer my inquiry and with his help I was able to successfully figure out the problem and fix it.
LP作りや商品ページ作りを比較的簡単に行うことのできる最適なツールだと思います。サポートも迅速で親切でした。ご対応、感謝いたします。
The platform is very user-friendly, and the team is exceptionally helpful and responsive, resolving any issues promptly.
Great app, and great support team. I had a great experience with Marcel who helped me fix a few issues I had with my landing page. Very responsive team.
PageFly is a very useful page builder app. I had a language redirect issue on my store, and their support team helped me patiently and successfully fixed the problem. The response was professional, fast, and very helpful. I really appreciate their support, and I will continue using PageFly. Highly recommended!
No reviews yet.
Migration support varies by app and category. PageFly Landing Page Builder and PODpartner: Print on Demand both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PODpartner: Print on Demand" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
