Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Parkour | Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Parkour | Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Accurate Google Ads & GA4 tracking via GTM. Server-side, multi-market, GDPR/CCPA Consent Mode v2.
| Metric | Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed | Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 191 | 52 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing tiers | — | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 4 | — |
| Languages | 1 supported | 8 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2024 | Apr 2025 |
Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed edges out Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed at Free, Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed has the larger user base (191 reviews vs 52), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM's 52-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed audit • Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Parkour | Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM |
|---|---|---|
| conversion api | #1 | Not ranked |
| meta pixel | #1 | Not ranked |
| pixels | #1 | Not ranked |
| consent mode | Not ranked | #5 |
| google ads | Not ranked | #7 |
Not featured in any section recently.
Both Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed and Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM offer paid plans only. Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed starts at Free; Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 191 reviews) compared to Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM (4.8★ from 52 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed has the deeper published review base (191 vs 52), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (191 reviews). Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (52 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed and Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Omega Google Ads, GA4 & GTM" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
