| PageFly Landing Page Builder | Varco | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Go beyond themes—create conversion-ready landing & product pages fast, no coding required.
| Metric | PageFly Landing Page Builder | Varco: Variants on Collections |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 5.7k | 1 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 6 | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 35 new | — |
| Languages | 9 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2017 | Feb 2026 |
PageFly Landing Page Builder and Varco: Variants on Collections are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: PageFly Landing Page Builder at Free plan available, Varco: Variants on Collections at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. PageFly Landing Page Builder has the larger user base (5,673 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Varco: Variants on Collections's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: PageFly Landing Page Builder audit • Varco: Variants on Collections audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | PageFly Landing Page Builder | Varco |
|---|---|---|
| page builder | #2 | Not ranked |
| quiz builder | #36 | Not ranked |
| contact form builder | #58 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
| Signal | PageFly Landing Page Builder | Varco |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (5.7k) | 5.0 ★ (1) |
| Rating distribution | 594% 41% 31% 21% 13% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +8 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +35 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +125 | — |
Both PageFly Landing Page Builder and Varco: Variants on Collections offer paid plans only. PageFly Landing Page Builder starts at Free plan available; Varco: Variants on Collections starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
PageFly Landing Page Builder (4.9★, 5,673 reviews) and Varco: Variants on Collections (5.0★, 1 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. PageFly Landing Page Builder fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Varco: Variants on Collections is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. PageFly Landing Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,673 reviews vs 1), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
The app is not bad, but you seriously need to hire a decent support team! Anytime we need help with something, it takes HOURS for them to figure it out, not mentioning that I have to repeat myself over and over so they understand the issue
Honestly I have mixed feelings using Pagefly, some parts felt a little old school with the manual configurations, another part with the help of AI managed to assist me with the html coding which makes the experience more easy, some fine tuning that I wasn't able to do was assisted by a helpful human support team. Aldwi
I had a great experience using PageFly, and I especially want to thank Brock for the amazing support! Brock was incredibly professional, patient, and responsive throughout the whole process. He quickly understood my issues and provided clear and effective solutions that helped me solve problems efficiently. His support
Extremely patient
professional service, snell geholpen
No reviews yet.
PageFly Landing Page Builder typically suits established stores with steady traffic based on its review-base composition (5,673 reviews). Varco: Variants on Collections aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (1 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. PageFly Landing Page Builder and Varco: Variants on Collections both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Varco: Variants on Collections" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.