FF vs onFact

FF: Factures Client en France and onFact are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

Pricing entry tiers: FF: Factures Client en France at Free plan available, onFact at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is FF: Factures Client en France or onFact cheaper?

Both FF: Factures Client en France and onFact offer paid plans only. FF: Factures Client en France starts at Free plan available; onFact starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, FF: Factures Client en France or onFact?

FF: Factures Client en France (5.0★, 43 reviews) and onFact (5.0★, 1 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose FF: Factures Client en France or onFact?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. FF: Factures Client en France does carry the larger published review base (43 vs 1). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, FF: Factures Client en France or onFact?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. FF: Factures Client en France has the deeper published review base (43 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Shopify App Store merchants?

FF: Factures Client en France typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (43 reviews). onFact typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between FF: Factures Client en France and onFact?

Migration support varies by app and category. FF: Factures Client en France and onFact both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from onFact" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.