Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu vs Octopixels ‑ Facebook Pixel

Based on the data on this page, Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs Octopixels ‑ Facebook Pixel's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu at Free to install, Octopixels ‑ Facebook Pixel at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu has the larger user base (116 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Octopixels ‑ Facebook Pixel's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Octopixels ‑ Facebook Pixel's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu or Octopixels ‑ Facebook Pixel cheaper?

Both Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu and Octopixels ‑ Facebook Pixel offer paid plans only. Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu starts at Free to install; Octopixels ‑ Facebook Pixel starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Should I choose Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu or Octopixels ‑ Facebook Pixel?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu does carry the larger published review base (116 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu or Octopixels ‑ Facebook Pixel?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu has the deeper published review base (116 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Shopify App Store merchants?

Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (116 reviews). Octopixels ‑ Facebook Pixel typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu and Octopixels ‑ Facebook Pixel?

Migration support varies by app and category. Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu and Octopixels ‑ Facebook Pixel both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Octopixels ‑ Facebook Pixel" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.