Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Let customers request quotes, negotiate prices, and turn deals into orders – all in one B2B workflow
| SP Request a Quote (RFQ) | SF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | SP Request a Quote (RFQ) | SF: Request a Quote |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 27 | 0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2025 | Jun 2026 |
Based on the data on this page, SP Request a Quote (RFQ) is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs SF: Request a Quote's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: SP Request a Quote (RFQ) at Free plan available, SF: Request a Quote at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to SP Request a Quote (RFQ); mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — SF: Request a Quote's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than SP Request a Quote (RFQ)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: SP Request a Quote (RFQ) audit • SF: Request a Quote audit
| Keyword | SP Request a Quote (RFQ) | SF |
|---|---|---|
| b2b quote requests | #1 | Not ranked |
| quotes | #4 | Not ranked |
| pricing quote | #8 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Both SP Request a Quote (RFQ) and SF: Request a Quote offer paid plans only. SP Request a Quote (RFQ) starts at Free plan available; SF: Request a Quote starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. SP Request a Quote (RFQ) does carry the larger published review base (27 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. SP Request a Quote (RFQ) has the deeper published review base (27 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
SP Request a Quote (RFQ) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (27 reviews). SF: Request a Quote typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. SP Request a Quote (RFQ) and SF: Request a Quote both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from SF: Request a Quote" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
