Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Sikker MitID Aldersverificering. Overhold dansk lovgivning ved salg af alkohol, tobak og damp.
| MitID Aldersverificering | Avada Accessibility ADA EAA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Ensure your store complies with accessibility laws, especially in Germany, the United States, EU,etc
| Metric | MitID Aldersverificering | Avada Accessibility ADA EAA |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.1 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | ★ 314 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | ★ 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 2 |
| Languages | 2 supported | 6 supported |
| Listed since | May 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Based on the data on this page, Avada Accessibility ADA EAA is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs MitID Aldersverificering's 2.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: MitID Aldersverificering at Free plan available, Avada Accessibility ADA EAA at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Avada Accessibility ADA EAA has the larger user base (314 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. MitID Aldersverificering's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Avada Accessibility ADA EAA; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — MitID Aldersverificering's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Avada Accessibility ADA EAA's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: MitID Aldersverificering audit • Avada Accessibility ADA EAA audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | MitID Aldersverificering | Avada Accessibility ADA EAA |
|---|---|---|
| access | Not ranked | #1 |
| accessibility | Not ranked | #1 |
| ada compliance | Not ranked | #1 |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
Both MitID Aldersverificering and Avada Accessibility ADA EAA offer paid plans only. MitID Aldersverificering starts at Free plan available; Avada Accessibility ADA EAA starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Avada Accessibility ADA EAA has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 314 reviews) compared to MitID Aldersverificering (2.1★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Avada Accessibility ADA EAA holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 2.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Avada Accessibility ADA EAA has the deeper published review base (314 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
MitID Aldersverificering typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). Avada Accessibility ADA EAA typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (314 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. MitID Aldersverificering and Avada Accessibility ADA EAA both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from MitID Aldersverificering" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
