Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
130+ stunning, expertly-coded sections to build your dream store. No coding required.
| MIT Sections Pro | PageFly Landing Page Builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Go beyond themes—create conversion-ready landing & product pages fast, no coding required.
| Metric | MIT Sections Pro | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 5.6k |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | ★ 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 7 |
| Review velocity (30d) | — | 27 new |
| Languages | 1 supported | 9 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2025 | Sep 2017 |
MIT Sections Pro and PageFly Landing Page Builder are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: MIT Sections Pro at Free, PageFly Landing Page Builder at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. PageFly Landing Page Builder has the larger user base (5,624 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. MIT Sections Pro's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: MIT Sections Pro audit • PageFly Landing Page Builder audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | MIT Sections Pro | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| help center | #99 | #13 |
| page builder | #118 | #4 |
| contact | #210 | #18 |
Not featured in any section recently.
| Signal | MIT Sections Pro | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 5.0 ★ (1) | 4.9 ★ (5.6k) |
| Rating distribution | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— | 594% 42% 31% 21% 13% |
| Reviews · last 7 days | — | +5 |
| Reviews · last 30 days | — | +27 |
| Reviews · last 90 days | — | +112 |
No reviews yet.
Both MIT Sections Pro and PageFly Landing Page Builder offer paid plans only. MIT Sections Pro starts at Free; PageFly Landing Page Builder starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
MIT Sections Pro (5.0★, 1 reviews) and PageFly Landing Page Builder (4.9★, 5,624 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. MIT Sections Pro fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; PageFly Landing Page Builder is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. PageFly Landing Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,624 reviews vs 1), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
MIT Sections Pro typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1 reviews). PageFly Landing Page Builder aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (5,624 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Mahedi, was so helpful. I have been having some difficulty with figuring out how to navigate the app and he came in and assisted me with figuring out how to answer my inquiry and with his help I was able to successfully figure out the problem and fix it.
LP作りや商品ページ作りを比較的簡単に行うことのできる最適なツールだと思います。サポートも迅速で親切でした。ご対応、感謝いたします。
The platform is very user-friendly, and the team is exceptionally helpful and responsive, resolving any issues promptly.
Great app, and great support team. I had a great experience with Marcel who helped me fix a few issues I had with my landing page. Very responsive team.
PageFly is a very useful page builder app. I had a language redirect issue on my store, and their support team helped me patiently and successfully fixed the problem. The response was professional, fast, and very helpful. I really appreciate their support, and I will continue using PageFly. Highly recommended!
Migration support varies by app and category. MIT Sections Pro and PageFly Landing Page Builder both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from MIT Sections Pro" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
