Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Create custom fields and metafields, import them in bulk, and enrich product pages and SEO.
| Hulk Custom Fields Metafields | Avada Blog SEO AEO Content | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Write SEO and AEO blog posts in a minute with our AI content generator and drive organic traffic
| Metric | Hulk Custom Fields Metafields | Avada Blog SEO AEO Content |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 61 | ★ 573 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Languages | 17 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Mar 2018 | Jul 2024 |
Based on the data on this page, Avada Blog SEO AEO Content is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.9★ vs Hulk Custom Fields Metafields's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Hulk Custom Fields Metafields at Free plan available, Avada Blog SEO AEO Content at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Avada Blog SEO AEO Content has the larger user base (573 reviews vs 61), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Hulk Custom Fields Metafields's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Avada Blog SEO AEO Content; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Hulk Custom Fields Metafields's 61-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Avada Blog SEO AEO Content's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Hulk Custom Fields Metafields audit • Avada Blog SEO AEO Content audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Hulk Custom Fields Metafields | Avada Blog SEO AEO Content |
|---|---|---|
| blog content management | Not ranked | #1 |
| blog | Not ranked | #1 |
| ai blog content generator | Not ranked | #1 |
| metafields | #18 | Not ranked |
| metafield | #18 | Not ranked |
| Signal | Hulk Custom Fields Metafields | Avada Blog SEO AEO Content |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.2 ★ (61) | 4.9 ★ (573) |
| Rating distribution | 581% 45% 30% 23% 111% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
Installed app and this did not work (Yuva theme). The field simply resumed blank on the product page after setting items to display. Contacted support for help. Didn’t know what the issue was (even after gaining access to my store) and escalated to developers who after 24 hours still had no response. Asked the support
Both Hulk Custom Fields Metafields and Avada Blog SEO AEO Content offer paid plans only. Hulk Custom Fields Metafields starts at Free plan available; Avada Blog SEO AEO Content starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Avada Blog SEO AEO Content has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 573 reviews) compared to Hulk Custom Fields Metafields (4.2★ from 61 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Avada Blog SEO AEO Content holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Avada Blog SEO AEO Content has the deeper published review base (573 vs 61), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Hulk Custom Fields Metafields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (61 reviews). Avada Blog SEO AEO Content typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (573 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Metafields Master nos hay brindado gran flexibilidad y control sobre el manejo de los datos en Shopify. Una herramienta invaluable en nuestro Shopify Stack y el servicio es atento y veloz en solucionarte. Nitesh y el equipo son fabulosos, gracias!!
Wow! With this product I'm able to better optimise my SEO without affecting my generic product descriptions. Since I started using it, I've only seen my page go up on Google ranking, which has generated more sales and new customer engagement.
We received an email from HulkApps informing us that there was a critical issue with Metafields and that they lost 689 of our media files and are unable to recover them. Their only solution is to offer us a $30 credit and a discount on their products. Absolutely unacceptable.
No reviews yet.
Migration support varies by app and category. Hulk Custom Fields Metafields and Avada Blog SEO AEO Content both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Hulk Custom Fields Metafields" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
