Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Allows you to quickly create pages through the layouts from the library and change their content.
| LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder | MIT Canonical URLs | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — |
Easily set custom canonical tags/URLs. Fix duplicate content issues & prioritize URLs for crawling.
| Metric | LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder | MIT Canonical URLs |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 1.3k | 0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 2 | — |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Dec 2019 | Jun 2025 |
Based on the data on this page, LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs MIT Canonical URLs's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder at Free plan available, MIT Canonical URLs at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder has the larger user base (1,315 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. MIT Canonical URLs's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — MIT Canonical URLs's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder audit • MIT Canonical URLs audit
| Keyword | LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder | MIT Canonical URLs |
|---|---|---|
| page builder | #6 | Not ranked |
| builder | #6 | Not ranked |
| landing pages | #7 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
Both LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder and MIT Canonical URLs offer paid plans only. LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder starts at Free plan available; MIT Canonical URLs starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; MIT Canonical URLs is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (1,315 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1,315 reviews). MIT Canonical URLs aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LayoutHub ‑ Easy Page Builder and MIT Canonical URLs both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from MIT Canonical URLs" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
