Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Print, send email & export PDF invoices, quotes, packing slips for orders & draft orders
| Invoice Falcon | Bizyness | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Invoice Falcon | Bizyness |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 328 | 27 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free trial available |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jul 2019 | Aug 2022 |
Bizyness edges out Invoice Falcon on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Invoice Falcon at Free plan available, Bizyness at Free trial available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Invoice Falcon has the larger user base (328 reviews vs 27), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Bizyness's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Bizyness; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Invoice Falcon's 328-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Bizyness's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Invoice Falcon audit • Bizyness audit
| Keyword | Invoice Falcon | Bizyness |
|---|---|---|
| credit notes | #23 | #814 |
Both Invoice Falcon and Bizyness offer paid plans only. Invoice Falcon starts at Free plan available; Bizyness starts at Free trial available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Bizyness has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 27 reviews) compared to Invoice Falcon (4.8★ from 328 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Bizyness holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Invoice Falcon has the deeper published review base (328 vs 27), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Invoice Falcon typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (328 reviews). Bizyness typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (27 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Invoice Falcon and Bizyness both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Bizyness" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.