Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Maximize Your Store Sales & ROI with AI Agents, Search, Merchandising, and Personalization.
| Fast Simon AI Search & Filters | PartFinder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Transform your store with Make, Model, Year search for an efficient shopping experience.
| Metric | Fast Simon AI Search & Filters | PartFinder: Year Make Model |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 353 | 15 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free trial available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 5 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Feb 2014 | Mar 2017 |
PartFinder: Year Make Model edges out Fast Simon AI Search & Filters on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Fast Simon AI Search & Filters at Free plan available, PartFinder: Year Make Model at Free trial available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Fast Simon AI Search & Filters has the larger user base (353 reviews vs 15), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. PartFinder: Year Make Model's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to PartFinder: Year Make Model; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Fast Simon AI Search & Filters's 353-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PartFinder: Year Make Model's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Fast Simon AI Search & Filters audit • PartFinder: Year Make Model audit
| Keyword | Fast Simon AI Search & Filters | PartFinder |
|---|---|---|
| search filter | #6 | Not ranked |
| year make model | Not ranked | #8 |
| ai search | #11 | Not ranked |
| year make model search | Not ranked | #11 |
| filters | #13 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Both Fast Simon AI Search & Filters and PartFinder: Year Make Model offer paid plans only. Fast Simon AI Search & Filters starts at Free plan available; PartFinder: Year Make Model starts at Free trial available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
PartFinder: Year Make Model has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 15 reviews) compared to Fast Simon AI Search & Filters (4.8★ from 353 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
PartFinder: Year Make Model holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Fast Simon AI Search & Filters has the deeper published review base (353 vs 15), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Fast Simon AI Search & Filters typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (353 reviews). PartFinder: Year Make Model typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (15 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Fast Simon AI Search & Filters and PartFinder: Year Make Model both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PartFinder: Year Make Model" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
