Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Shoppable Instagram feed with different Grid / Slider layouts and lot of customization options.
| Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed | Rubik Variant Images & Swatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Set multiple variant images, display only correct images. Show color swatches with image variants
| Metric | Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed | Rubik Variant Images & Swatch |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 24 | ★ 398 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 1 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 15 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2013 | Oct 2024 |
Rubik Variant Images & Swatch edges out Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed at Free plan available, Rubik Variant Images & Swatch at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Rubik Variant Images & Swatch has the larger user base (398 reviews vs 24), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Rubik Variant Images & Swatch; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed's 24-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Rubik Variant Images & Swatch's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed audit • Rubik Variant Images & Swatch audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed | Rubik Variant Images & Swatch |
|---|---|---|
| variant image gallery | Not ranked | #1 |
| variant images | Not ranked | #1 |
| image gallery | Not ranked | #3 |
| instagram feed | #23 | Not ranked |
| instagram feeds | #24 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
Both Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed and Rubik Variant Images & Swatch offer paid plans only. Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed starts at Free plan available; Rubik Variant Images & Swatch starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Rubik Variant Images & Swatch has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 398 reviews) compared to Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed (4.8★ from 24 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Rubik Variant Images & Swatch is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. Rubik Variant Images & Swatch has more onboarding documentation maturity (398 reviews vs 24), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (24 reviews). Rubik Variant Images & Swatch aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (398 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed and Rubik Variant Images & Swatch both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Imageagram ‑ Instagram Feed" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
