Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Reduce refunds transforming them into exchanges and new sales and eliminate manual work
| iF Returns & Exchanges | XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
Protect orders with better shipping protection, fast claims, flexible solutions that reduce losses
| Metric | iF Returns & Exchanges | XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 24 | ★ 630 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free to install |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Languages | 4 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2023 | Aug 2024 |
XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard edges out iF Returns & Exchanges on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: iF Returns & Exchanges at Free to install, XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard has the larger user base (630 reviews vs 24), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. iF Returns & Exchanges's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — iF Returns & Exchanges's 24-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: iF Returns & Exchanges audit • XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard audit
| Last updated |
|---|
| — |
| — |
| Keyword | iF Returns & Exchanges | XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard |
|---|---|---|
| protection returns | #24 | #1 |
| returns and exchanges | #23 | #7 |
| exchanges | #24 | #11 |
Both iF Returns & Exchanges and XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard offer paid plans only. iF Returns & Exchanges starts at Free to install; XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 630 reviews) compared to iF Returns & Exchanges (4.8★ from 24 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard has the deeper published review base (630 vs 24), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
iF Returns & Exchanges typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (24 reviews). XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (630 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. iF Returns & Exchanges and XCOTTON Post Purchase Guard both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from iF Returns & Exchanges" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
