Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
CLP hazard info & GPSR responsible person on your product pages, in 24 EU languages.
| GPSR & CLP Hazard Labels | Avada Accessibility ADA EAA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Ensure your store complies with accessibility laws, especially in Germany, the United States, EU,etc
| Metric | GPSR & CLP Hazard Labels | Avada Accessibility ADA EAA |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 314 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 2 |
| Languages | 17 supported | 6 supported |
| Listed since | Jul 2026 | Jan 2025 |
GPSR & CLP Hazard Labels and Avada Accessibility ADA EAA are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: GPSR & CLP Hazard Labels at Free plan available, Avada Accessibility ADA EAA at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Avada Accessibility ADA EAA has the larger user base (314 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. GPSR & CLP Hazard Labels's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: GPSR & CLP Hazard Labels audit • Avada Accessibility ADA EAA audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | GPSR & CLP Hazard Labels | Avada Accessibility ADA EAA |
|---|---|---|
| access | Not ranked | #1 |
| accessibility | Not ranked | #1 |
| ada compliance | Not ranked | #1 |
| gpsr compliance and labeling | #10 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
Both GPSR & CLP Hazard Labels and Avada Accessibility ADA EAA offer paid plans only. GPSR & CLP Hazard Labels starts at Free plan available; Avada Accessibility ADA EAA starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
GPSR & CLP Hazard Labels (5.0★, 1 reviews) and Avada Accessibility ADA EAA (5.0★, 314 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. Avada Accessibility ADA EAA does carry the larger published review base (314 vs 1). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Avada Accessibility ADA EAA has the deeper published review base (314 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
GPSR & CLP Hazard Labels typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). Avada Accessibility ADA EAA typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (314 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. GPSR & CLP Hazard Labels and Avada Accessibility ADA EAA both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GPSR & CLP Hazard Labels" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
