Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Submits Product Feeds for Google Shopping, Microsoft, Meta. Supports multi-country/currency/language
| Simprosys Google Shopping Feed | Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Competitor Price Tracking of Any URL, Automatic Price Matching & Price Comparison Table
| Metric | Simprosys Google Shopping Feed | Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4.4k | 5 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free trial available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 1 | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 115 new | — |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Aug 2017 | Mar 2025 |
Based on the data on this page, Simprosys Google Shopping Feed is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.9★ vs Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Simprosys Google Shopping Feed at Free trial available, Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Simprosys Google Shopping Feed has the larger user base (4,443 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Simprosys Google Shopping Feed; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Simprosys Google Shopping Feed's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Simprosys Google Shopping Feed audit • Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing audit
| Keyword | Simprosys Google Shopping Feed | Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing |
|---|---|---|
| google shopping | #1 | Not ranked |
| feed | #1 | Not ranked |
| competitor prices | Not ranked | #4 |
| dynamic pricing | Not ranked | #7 |
| product data | #8 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
| Signal | Simprosys Google Shopping Feed | Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (4.4k) | 4.2 ★ (5) |
| Rating distribution | 597% 41% 30% 20% 12% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +19 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +115 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +315 | — |
Both Simprosys Google Shopping Feed and Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing offer paid plans only. Simprosys Google Shopping Feed starts at Free trial available; Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Simprosys Google Shopping Feed has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 4,443 reviews) compared to Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing (4.2★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Simprosys Google Shopping Feed fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. Simprosys Google Shopping Feed has more onboarding documentation maturity (4,443 reviews vs 5), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Simprosys Google Shopping Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (4,443 reviews). Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (5 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
excelent! Mehul was very helpful
The customer service was excellent; they were very patient in helping to resolve the issue!
The app team handled the matter efficiently and professionally; I am very grateful for their support in resolving the issue with my account.
Great app with good features to google regarding their market feature!
I can't thank the Symprosys Team enough for their outstanding support. They went above and beyond to help me resolve a complex Pinterest Merchant issue that I had been struggling with. Their knowledge, patience, and dedication were exceptional throughout the entire process. Every question was answered promptly, every u
No reviews yet.
Migration support varies by app and category. Simprosys Google Shopping Feed and Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Lurk ‑ Dynamic Pricing" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
