Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
AI page builder for home, product, collection, landing, about and contact pages. No code.
| Nabu for Google Shopping Feed | PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Create Google Shopping feed, Google feed & product feed. Syncs to Google Merchant Center & YouTube.
| Metric | Nabu for Google Shopping Feed | PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 546 | ★ 5.9k |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 4 |
| Review velocity (30d) | — | 52 new |
| Languages | 20 supported | 9 supported |
| Listed since | Mar 2020 | Sep 2017 |
Based on the data on this page, PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.9★ vs Nabu for Google Shopping Feed's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Nabu for Google Shopping Feed at Free to install, PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder has the larger user base (5,896 reviews vs 546), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Nabu for Google Shopping Feed's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Nabu for Google Shopping Feed's 546-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Nabu for Google Shopping Feed audit • PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Nabu for Google Shopping Feed | PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| center | #8 | #24 |
| ai | #239 | #63 |
| support | #198 | #215 |
| form | #233 | #200 |
| forms | #230 | #238 |
Not featured in any section recently.
| Signal | Nabu for Google Shopping Feed | PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.5 ★ (546) | 4.9 ★ (5.9k) |
| Rating distribution | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— | 593% 42% 31% 21% 13% |
| Reviews · last 7 days | — | +14 |
| Reviews · last 30 days | — | +52 |
| Reviews · last 90 days | — | +131 |
No reviews yet.
Both Nabu for Google Shopping Feed and PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder offer paid plans only. Nabu for Google Shopping Feed starts at Free to install; PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 5,896 reviews) compared to Nabu for Google Shopping Feed (4.5★ from 546 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder has the deeper published review base (5,896 vs 546), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Nabu for Google Shopping Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (546 reviews). PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder typically suits established teams with steady usage based on its published review base (5,896 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
I had a wonderful experience with PageFly and couldn’t be happier with the landing page the team helped me build. The design team did an amazing job bringing my ideas to life and paying attention to every detail. A special shoutout to Eli for the excellent live chat support always helpful, patient, and quick to assist
The app is good. I had a problem with some of my products not loading correctly and Eli was incredibly kind and helpful. He solved the problem quickly and was very efficient. I can only hope if I have another snafu that I'll be connected with him again because he was VERY helpful!!! Thanks Eli!
Migration support varies by app and category. Nabu for Google Shopping Feed and PageFly ✦ AI Page Builder both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Nabu for Google Shopping Feed" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
