Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Make shopping more visual, immersive, and fun with swipeable stories.
| Fabext Stories | Nitro Lookbook & Image Gallery | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Effortlessly create stunning lookbooks & image galleries to captivate your audiences and drive sales
| Metric | Fabext Stories | Nitro Lookbook & Image Gallery |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 39 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 5 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Aug 2025 | Jul 2024 |
Based on the data on this page, Nitro Lookbook & Image Gallery is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs Fabext Stories's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Fabext Stories at Free plan available, Nitro Lookbook & Image Gallery at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Nitro Lookbook & Image Gallery; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Fabext Stories's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Nitro Lookbook & Image Gallery's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Fabext Stories audit • Nitro Lookbook & Image Gallery audit
| Keyword | Fabext Stories | Nitro Lookbook & Image Gallery |
|---|---|---|
| shoppable lookbook gallery | Not ranked | #5 |
| image gallery | Not ranked | #7 |
| variant image gallery | Not ranked | #22 |
Both Fabext Stories and Nitro Lookbook & Image Gallery offer paid plans only. Fabext Stories starts at Free plan available; Nitro Lookbook & Image Gallery starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Nitro Lookbook & Image Gallery does carry the larger published review base (39 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Nitro Lookbook & Image Gallery has the deeper published review base (39 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Fabext Stories typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Nitro Lookbook & Image Gallery typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (39 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Fabext Stories and Nitro Lookbook & Image Gallery both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Fabext Stories" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
