Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Create custom forms and storefront features that capture and route data—no custom backend required.
| FieldsRaven | Textbox & Textfield by Textify | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Add a textbox or textfield to your product page. Customers can add notes & more in custom fields.
| Metric | FieldsRaven | Textbox & Textfield by Textify |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 4 | ★ 153 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free trial available | Free trial available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 5 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Feb 2022 | Apr 2021 |
FieldsRaven edges out Textbox & Textfield by Textify on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: FieldsRaven at Free trial available, Textbox & Textfield by Textify at Free trial available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Textbox & Textfield by Textify has the larger user base (153 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. FieldsRaven's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to FieldsRaven; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Textbox & Textfield by Textify's 153-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than FieldsRaven's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: FieldsRaven audit • Textbox & Textfield by Textify audit
| Keyword | FieldsRaven | Textbox & Textfield by Textify |
|---|---|---|
| text | Not ranked | #1 |
| product registration | #8 | Not ranked |
| metafields | Not ranked | #23 |
| metafield | Not ranked | #24 |
| quizzes | #122 | Not ranked |
Both FieldsRaven and Textbox & Textfield by Textify offer paid plans only. FieldsRaven starts at Free trial available; Textbox & Textfield by Textify starts at Free trial available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
FieldsRaven has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Textbox & Textfield by Textify (4.8★ from 153 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
FieldsRaven holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Textbox & Textfield by Textify has the deeper published review base (153 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
FieldsRaven typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). Textbox & Textfield by Textify typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (153 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. FieldsRaven and Textbox & Textfield by Textify both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from FieldsRaven" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.