Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
AI-native conversational SMS marketing that recovers carts, runs campaigns, and grows on autopilot.
| EyeCatcher | TxtCart AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | EyeCatcher | TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 386 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free to install |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 1 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Dec 2019 | Feb 2021 |
Based on the data on this page, TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.9★ vs EyeCatcher's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: EyeCatcher at Free plan available, TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing has the larger user base (386 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. EyeCatcher's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — EyeCatcher's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: EyeCatcher audit • TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing audit
| Keyword | EyeCatcher | TxtCart AI |
|---|---|---|
| Not ranked | #13 | |
| ai agent | Not ranked | #22 |
| instagram agent | Not ranked | #23 |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
Both EyeCatcher and TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing offer paid plans only. EyeCatcher starts at Free plan available; TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. EyeCatcher fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing has more onboarding documentation maturity (386 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
EyeCatcher typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (0 reviews). TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (386 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. EyeCatcher and TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from EyeCatcher" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
