Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Easy and smart page builder: build any stunning, sales-ready pages - now supercharged with AI
| EComposer Landing Page Builder | SectionMonster | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
100+ Premium theme sections and CRO blocks designed to increase AOV. No coding, No developer needed
| Metric | EComposer Landing Page Builder | SectionMonster: Theme Sections |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 3.5k | 18 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 6 | — |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | May 2022 | Jan 2026 |
EComposer Landing Page Builder and SectionMonster: Theme Sections are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: EComposer Landing Page Builder at Free plan available, SectionMonster: Theme Sections at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
EComposer Landing Page Builder has the larger user base (3,474 reviews vs 18), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. SectionMonster: Theme Sections's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: EComposer Landing Page Builder audit • SectionMonster: Theme Sections audit
| Keyword | EComposer Landing Page Builder | SectionMonster |
|---|---|---|
| coming soon page | #3 | #18 |
| sections | #16 | #7 |
| theme sections | #23 | #7 |
| help center | #8 | #28 |
| page builder | #1 | #542 |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
| Signal | EComposer Landing Page Builder | SectionMonster |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (3.5k) | 5.0 ★ (18) |
| Rating distribution | 596% 42% 30% 20% 12% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
Both EComposer Landing Page Builder and SectionMonster: Theme Sections offer paid plans only. EComposer Landing Page Builder starts at Free plan available; SectionMonster: Theme Sections starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
EComposer Landing Page Builder (4.9★, 3,474 reviews) and SectionMonster: Theme Sections (5.0★, 18 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
SectionMonster: Theme Sections holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. EComposer Landing Page Builder has the deeper published review base (3,474 vs 18), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
EComposer Landing Page Builder typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3,474 reviews). SectionMonster: Theme Sections typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (18 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Me gustó mucho la app, es algo complicada en algunos puntos de edición pero me sirve super bien, es bonita, tiene muchos features bonitos y ayudan mucho en soporte técnico!
Luna helped us with an issue with padding, 5/5 recommend this app
5 Star app! Easy to use and customise designs. I needed help and was able to live chat with Andy almost immediately. Very helpful - was able to help me fix the issue in only a few steps. Would definitely recommend!
Anna from Support Team is A++ class manager. Only the best recommendations.
No reviews yet.
Migration support varies by app and category. EComposer Landing Page Builder and SectionMonster: Theme Sections both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from SectionMonster: Theme Sections" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
