Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Easy and smart page builder: build any stunning, sales-ready pages - now supercharged with AI
| EComposer Landing Page Builder | Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
AI store builder: landing pages, blogs, quizzes, product pages, sections, SEO/CRO audits, and more.
| Metric | EComposer Landing Page Builder | Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 3.4k | 22 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 5 | — |
| Languages | 1 supported | 21 supported |
| Listed since | May 2022 | Jul 2025 |
EComposer Landing Page Builder edges out Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: EComposer Landing Page Builder at Free plan available, Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. EComposer Landing Page Builder has the larger user base (3,400 reviews vs 22), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to EComposer Landing Page Builder; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor's 22-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than EComposer Landing Page Builder's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: EComposer Landing Page Builder audit • Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | EComposer Landing Page Builder | Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor |
|---|---|---|
| ai page builder | #7 | #4 |
| page builder | #2 | #12 |
| pages | #3 | #12 |
| page | #4 | #12 |
| builder | #1 | #22 |
Not featured in any section recently.
| Signal | EComposer Landing Page Builder | Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (3.4k) | 4.8 ★ (22) |
| Rating distribution | 596% 42% 30% 20% 12% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
Both EComposer Landing Page Builder and Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor offer paid plans only. EComposer Landing Page Builder starts at Free plan available; Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
EComposer Landing Page Builder has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 3,400 reviews) compared to Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor (4.8★ from 22 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. EComposer Landing Page Builder fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. EComposer Landing Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (3,400 reviews vs 22), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Me gustó mucho la app, es algo complicada en algunos puntos de edición pero me sirve super bien, es bonita, tiene muchos features bonitos y ayudan mucho en soporte técnico!
Luna helped us with an issue with padding, 5/5 recommend this app
5 Star app! Easy to use and customise designs. I needed help and was able to live chat with Andy almost immediately. Very helpful - was able to help me fix the issue in only a few steps. Would definitely recommend!
Anna from Support Team is A++ class manager. Only the best recommendations.
No reviews yet.
EComposer Landing Page Builder typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (3,400 reviews). Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (22 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. EComposer Landing Page Builder and Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Fudge AI Page Builder + Editor" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
