Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Top quality Back-In-Stock app built by email marketing vendor. EU Hosted for GDPR.
| Easy | OnVoard Back In Stock | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Easy:Stock ‑ Product Labels | OnVoard Back In Stock |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 55 | 15 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free trial available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2020 | Oct 2020 |
OnVoard Back In Stock edges out Easy:Stock ‑ Product Labels on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Easy:Stock ‑ Product Labels at Free trial available, OnVoard Back In Stock at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to OnVoard Back In Stock; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Easy:Stock ‑ Product Labels's 55-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than OnVoard Back In Stock's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Easy:Stock ‑ Product Labels audit • OnVoard Back In Stock audit
| Keyword | Easy | OnVoard Back In Stock |
|---|---|---|
| product labels | #15 | Not ranked |
| product badges | #24 | Not ranked |
Both Easy:Stock ‑ Product Labels and OnVoard Back In Stock offer paid plans only. Easy:Stock ‑ Product Labels starts at Free trial available; OnVoard Back In Stock starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
OnVoard Back In Stock has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 15 reviews) compared to Easy:Stock ‑ Product Labels (4.7★ from 55 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
OnVoard Back In Stock holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Easy:Stock ‑ Product Labels has the deeper published review base (55 vs 15), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Easy:Stock ‑ Product Labels typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (55 reviews). OnVoard Back In Stock typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (15 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Easy:Stock ‑ Product Labels and OnVoard Back In Stock both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from OnVoard Back In Stock" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
