Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Conexión directa al SII. Boletas, facturas y notas de crédito 100% automatizadas.
| e‑Boletas ‑ DTE Chile SII | FF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | e‑Boletas ‑ DTE Chile SII | FF: Factures Client en France |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 43 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | ★ 5 | 4 |
| Languages | 2 supported | 2 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Based on the data on this page, FF: Factures Client en France is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs e‑Boletas ‑ DTE Chile SII's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: e‑Boletas ‑ DTE Chile SII at Free plan available, FF: Factures Client en France at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to FF: Factures Client en France; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — e‑Boletas ‑ DTE Chile SII's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than FF: Factures Client en France's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: e‑Boletas ‑ DTE Chile SII audit • FF: Factures Client en France audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
Both e‑Boletas ‑ DTE Chile SII and FF: Factures Client en France offer paid plans only. e‑Boletas ‑ DTE Chile SII starts at Free plan available; FF: Factures Client en France starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
FF: Factures Client en France has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 43 reviews) compared to e‑Boletas ‑ DTE Chile SII (3.8★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
FF: Factures Client en France holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. FF: Factures Client en France has the deeper published review base (43 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
e‑Boletas ‑ DTE Chile SII typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). FF: Factures Client en France typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (43 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. e‑Boletas ‑ DTE Chile SII and FF: Factures Client en France both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from e‑Boletas ‑ DTE Chile SII" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
