Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Leverage the power of Google ads Dynamic remarketing pixel w/ 1-click implemention
| Google Dynamic Remarketing WDS | Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
Create Facebook Pixels / Meta Pixels / Instagram Pixels with Server-Side Tracking & Conversion API
| Metric | Google Dynamic Remarketing WDS | Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 4 | ★ 116 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free trial available | Free to install |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 2 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 20 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2021 | Feb 2024 |
Based on the data on this page, Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs Google Dynamic Remarketing WDS's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Google Dynamic Remarketing WDS at Free trial available, Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu has the larger user base (116 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Google Dynamic Remarketing WDS's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Google Dynamic Remarketing WDS's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Google Dynamic Remarketing WDS audit • Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Google Dynamic Remarketing WDS | Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu |
|---|---|---|
| accurate conversion tracking | Not ranked | #1 |
| accurate conversion | Not ranked | #1 |
| pixel tracking | Not ranked | #1 |
| repro probe 1782243819801 1 | #76 | Not ranked |
| repro probe 1782162814679 1 | #77 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
Both Google Dynamic Remarketing WDS and Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu offer paid plans only. Google Dynamic Remarketing WDS starts at Free trial available; Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 116 reviews) compared to Google Dynamic Remarketing WDS (4.0★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu has the deeper published review base (116 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Google Dynamic Remarketing WDS typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (116 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Google Dynamic Remarketing WDS and Meta & Facebook Pixels by Nabu both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Google Dynamic Remarketing WDS" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
