Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Create customer sign-up forms as unique as your business, and save custom data to customer accounts.
| Helium Customer Fields | Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Automate account invites for customers, boosting efficiency and user experience.
| Metric | Helium Customer Fields | Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 1.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 342 | 1 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free trial available | Free trial available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | ★ 5 | 3 |
| Featured placements | 1 | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 21 new | — |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jul 2015 | Apr 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, Helium Customer Fields is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.5★ vs Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite's 1.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Helium Customer Fields at Free trial available, Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite at Free trial available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Helium Customer Fields has the larger user base (342 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Helium Customer Fields; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite's 1-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Helium Customer Fields's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Helium Customer Fields audit • Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite audit
| Keyword | Helium Customer Fields | Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #16 | Not ranked |
| registration form | #17 | Not ranked |
| registration forms | #19 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
| Signal | Helium Customer Fields | Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.5 ★ (342) | 1.0 ★ (1) |
| Rating distribution | 577% 47% 312% 20% 15% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +6 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +21 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +43 | — |
Both Helium Customer Fields and Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite offer paid plans only. Helium Customer Fields starts at Free trial available; Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite starts at Free trial available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Helium Customer Fields has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 342 reviews) compared to Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite (1.0★ from 1 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Helium Customer Fields holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 1.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Helium Customer Fields has the deeper published review base (342 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Helium Customer Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (342 reviews). Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
App works well for custom registration forms where you need confirmation steps, document uploads, and email confirmations. It also syncs well with Shopify admin for all customer data including tags, tax collection, and more. I have been using this app for years, and never had an issue.
Awesome support thanks Jakin !
Their customer support is phenomenal. They went above and beyond with an issue with my theme. Very highly recommended.
No reviews yet.
Migration support varies by app and category. Helium Customer Fields and Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Sender ‑ Auto Account Invite" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
