Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Sync and save every customer's cart across devices. Fewer abandoned carts, more recovered sales.
| Ecto (Casper) Persistent Cart | TxtCart AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
AI-native conversational SMS marketing that recovers carts, runs campaigns, and grows on autopilot.
| Metric | Ecto (Casper) Persistent Cart | TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 29 | ★ 511 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free to install |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 2 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 11 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2022 | Feb 2021 |
TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing edges out Ecto (Casper) Persistent Cart on rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Ecto (Casper) Persistent Cart at Free plan available, TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing has the larger user base (511 reviews vs 29), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Ecto (Casper) Persistent Cart's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Ecto (Casper) Persistent Cart's 29-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Ecto (Casper) Persistent Cart audit • TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Ecto (Casper) Persistent Cart | TxtCart AI |
|---|---|---|
| ai sales assistant | #185 | #174 |
| ai chatbot for sales | #196 | #170 |
Not featured in any section recently.
Both Ecto (Casper) Persistent Cart and TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing offer paid plans only. Ecto (Casper) Persistent Cart starts at Free plan available; TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 511 reviews) compared to Ecto (Casper) Persistent Cart (4.7★ from 29 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing has the deeper published review base (511 vs 29), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Ecto (Casper) Persistent Cart typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (29 reviews). TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (511 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Ecto (Casper) Persistent Cart and TxtCart AI: SMS Marketing both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Ecto (Casper) Persistent Cart" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
