Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Auto response and auto reply for contact us and newsletter subscription forms.
| WebPanda Contact AutoResponder | POWR Contact Form Builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Easily build unlimited custom forms for lead collection, contact forms, registration & support forms
| Metric | WebPanda Contact AutoResponder | POWR Contact Form Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 18 | ★ 668 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free trial available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | ★ 5 |
| Review velocity (30d) | — | 16 new |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2020 | Jul 2014 |
WebPanda Contact AutoResponder edges out POWR Contact Form Builder on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: WebPanda Contact AutoResponder at Free trial available, POWR Contact Form Builder at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. POWR Contact Form Builder has the larger user base (668 reviews vs 18), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. WebPanda Contact AutoResponder's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to WebPanda Contact AutoResponder; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — POWR Contact Form Builder's 668-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WebPanda Contact AutoResponder's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: WebPanda Contact AutoResponder audit • POWR Contact Form Builder audit
| Keyword | WebPanda Contact AutoResponder | POWR Contact Form Builder |
|---|---|---|
| contact us form | #14 | #9 |
| subscription form | #4 | #42 |
| contact | #44 | #4 |
| forms | #622 | #4 |
| form | #68 | #5 |
No tracked changes.
| Signal | WebPanda Contact AutoResponder | POWR Contact Form Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 5.0 ★ (18) | 4.7 ★ (668) |
| Rating distribution | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— | 583% 48% 32% 22% 15% |
| Reviews · last 7 days | — | +5 |
| Reviews · last 30 days | — | +16 |
| Reviews · last 90 days | — | +40 |
No reviews yet.
Both WebPanda Contact AutoResponder and POWR Contact Form Builder offer paid plans only. WebPanda Contact AutoResponder starts at Free trial available; POWR Contact Form Builder starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
WebPanda Contact AutoResponder has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 18 reviews) compared to POWR Contact Form Builder (4.7★ from 668 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. WebPanda Contact AutoResponder fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; POWR Contact Form Builder is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. POWR Contact Form Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (668 reviews vs 18), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
WebPanda Contact AutoResponder typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (18 reviews). POWR Contact Form Builder aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (668 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Not bad. I would like to know what data they keep and how they protect against spam. I would really like to see some integration for translating the form into store languages, either with the app or by integration with the popular translation apps in Shopify
Works perfectly - I have been using this app for many years, and it's the best form builder plugin I've found - plus it does a whole lot more useful things that make your website look so professional! Highly recommended.
app works well, customer service team very responsive and helpful.
Migration support varies by app and category. WebPanda Contact AutoResponder and POWR Contact Form Builder both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WebPanda Contact AutoResponder" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
