Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Collection Additional Fields allows you to add custom metadata fields to your store's collections.
| Collection Additional Fields | WTE ‑ Fields Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Manage product metafields (single-line text field) for your stores.
| Metric | Collection Additional Fields | WTE ‑ Fields Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 8 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free trial available | $2.58/month |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 5 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Aug 2018 | Feb 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, WTE ‑ Fields Manager is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs Collection Additional Fields's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Collection Additional Fields offers a free tier (Free trial available) while WTE ‑ Fields Manager starts at $2.58/month. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to WTE ‑ Fields Manager; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Collection Additional Fields's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WTE ‑ Fields Manager's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Collection Additional Fields audit • WTE ‑ Fields Manager audit
| Keyword | Collection Additional Fields | WTE ‑ Fields Manager |
|---|---|---|
| delete products | Not ranked | #16 |
| audit test kw | #222 | Not ranked |
Collection Additional Fields is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free trial available). WTE ‑ Fields Manager starts at $2.58/month. Both publish their pricing on the Shopify App Store; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. WTE ‑ Fields Manager does carry the larger published review base (8 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. WTE ‑ Fields Manager has the deeper published review base (8 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Collection Additional Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). WTE ‑ Fields Manager typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Collection Additional Fields and WTE ‑ Fields Manager both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Collection Additional Fields" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
