1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| CODFacile | Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated |
| CODFacile | Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated |
Lowest global shipping rates from NL, ES, DE, IT, PL, HU & CZ. Set-up and Labels/AWBs in 5 minutes
| Metric | CODFacile | Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 7 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 2 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Mar 2026 | Feb 2025 |
Based on the data on this page, Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs CODFacile's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: CODFacile at Free, Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — CODFacile's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: CODFacile audit • Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping audit
| — |
| Keyword | CODFacile | Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping |
|---|---|---|
| shopify flow | Not ranked | #237 |
Both CODFacile and Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping offer paid plans only. CODFacile starts at Free; Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. CODFacile fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping has more onboarding documentation maturity (7 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
CODFacile typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (0 reviews). Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (7 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. CODFacile and Shiperman ‑ Low Cost Shipping both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CODFacile" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
