Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Bulk edit products, prices and metafields in seconds with previews, scheduling, and a one-click undo
| Ablestar Bulk Product Editor | impact.com Affiliate Marketing | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Drive more sales and acquire new customers with affiliate marketing.
| Metric | Ablestar Bulk Product Editor | impact.com Affiliate Marketing |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 827 | 198 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free trial available |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 1 | 1 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jul 2017 | Jun 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, Ablestar Bulk Product Editor is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.9★ vs impact.com Affiliate Marketing's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Ablestar Bulk Product Editor at Free plan available, impact.com Affiliate Marketing at Free trial available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Ablestar Bulk Product Editor has the larger user base (827 reviews vs 198), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. impact.com Affiliate Marketing's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Ablestar Bulk Product Editor; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — impact.com Affiliate Marketing's 198-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Ablestar Bulk Product Editor's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Ablestar Bulk Product Editor audit • impact.com Affiliate Marketing audit
| Keyword | Ablestar Bulk Product Editor | impact.com Affiliate Marketing |
|---|---|---|
| metafield | #1 | Not ranked |
| metafields | #1 | Not ranked |
| bulk editing | #1 | Not ranked |
| affiliate marketing | Not ranked | #9 |
| affiliate programs | Not ranked | #12 |
No tracked changes.
Both Ablestar Bulk Product Editor and impact.com Affiliate Marketing offer paid plans only. Ablestar Bulk Product Editor starts at Free plan available; impact.com Affiliate Marketing starts at Free trial available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Ablestar Bulk Product Editor has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 827 reviews) compared to impact.com Affiliate Marketing (4.5★ from 198 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Ablestar Bulk Product Editor fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; impact.com Affiliate Marketing is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. Ablestar Bulk Product Editor has more onboarding documentation maturity (827 reviews vs 198), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Ablestar Bulk Product Editor typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (827 reviews). impact.com Affiliate Marketing aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (198 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Ablestar Bulk Product Editor and impact.com Affiliate Marketing both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from impact.com Affiliate Marketing" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
