Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| BoostX | EComposer Landing Page Builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| BoostX | EComposer Landing Page Builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Easy and smart page builder: build any stunning, sales-ready pages - now supercharged with AI
| Metric | BoostX: Sales Boost Sections | EComposer Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 3.4k |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free trial available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | ★ 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 5 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2025 | May 2022 |
BoostX: Sales Boost Sections and EComposer Landing Page Builder are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: BoostX: Sales Boost Sections at Free trial available, EComposer Landing Page Builder at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. EComposer Landing Page Builder has the larger user base (3,411 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. BoostX: Sales Boost Sections's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: BoostX: Sales Boost Sections audit • EComposer Landing Page Builder audit
| Keyword | BoostX | EComposer Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| help center | #143 | #11 |
| page builder | #170 | #2 |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
| Signal | BoostX | EComposer Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 5.0 ★ (1) | 4.9 ★ (3.4k) |
| Rating distribution | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— | 596% 42% 30% 20% 12% |
No reviews yet.
Both BoostX: Sales Boost Sections and EComposer Landing Page Builder offer paid plans only. BoostX: Sales Boost Sections starts at Free trial available; EComposer Landing Page Builder starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
BoostX: Sales Boost Sections (5.0★, 1 reviews) and EComposer Landing Page Builder (4.9★, 3,411 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. BoostX: Sales Boost Sections fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; EComposer Landing Page Builder is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. EComposer Landing Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (3,411 reviews vs 1), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Me gustó mucho la app, es algo complicada en algunos puntos de edición pero me sirve super bien, es bonita, tiene muchos features bonitos y ayudan mucho en soporte técnico!
Luna helped us with an issue with padding, 5/5 recommend this app
5 Star app! Easy to use and customise designs. I needed help and was able to live chat with Andy almost immediately. Very helpful - was able to help me fix the issue in only a few steps. Would definitely recommend!
Anna from Support Team is A++ class manager. Only the best recommendations.
BoostX: Sales Boost Sections typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1 reviews). EComposer Landing Page Builder aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (3,411 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. BoostX: Sales Boost Sections and EComposer Landing Page Builder both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from BoostX: Sales Boost Sections" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
