Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Enhance your blog experience by syncing posts from WordPress, Tumblr, Pinterest & other platforms.
| BlogFeeder ‑ Blog Importer | Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Intelligently links existing words in your store to collections & products.
| Metric | BlogFeeder ‑ Blog Importer | Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 138 | 30 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free trial available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 5 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 17 supported |
| Listed since | Mar 2012 | Oct 2022 |
Based on the data on this page, Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs BlogFeeder ‑ Blog Importer's 4.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: BlogFeeder ‑ Blog Importer at Free trial available, Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
BlogFeeder ‑ Blog Importer has the larger user base (138 reviews vs 30), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — BlogFeeder ‑ Blog Importer's 138-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: BlogFeeder ‑ Blog Importer audit • Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | BlogFeeder ‑ Blog Importer | Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks |
|---|---|---|
| seo ai blog | Not ranked | #9 |
| ai blog post | Not ranked | #13 |
| blogs | Not ranked | #22 |
| amazon importer | #147 | Not ranked |
| import amazon products | #238 | Not ranked |
Both BlogFeeder ‑ Blog Importer and Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks offer paid plans only. BlogFeeder ‑ Blog Importer starts at Free trial available; Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 30 reviews) compared to BlogFeeder ‑ Blog Importer (4.4★ from 138 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. BlogFeeder ‑ Blog Importer has the deeper published review base (138 vs 30), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
BlogFeeder ‑ Blog Importer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (138 reviews). Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (30 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. BlogFeeder ‑ Blog Importer and Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Automatic Linking ‑ InterLinks" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.