Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Verify pros, salons and students. Control who can buy, and who pays less.
| BeautyAList Login | Ymq B2B Lock, Login & Password | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Lock or hide products, collections, specific URLs or specific pages on your store with easy setup
| Metric | BeautyAList Login | Ymq B2B Lock, Login & Password |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 34 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free to install |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | — | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Dec 2023 | Aug 2023 |
Based on the data on this page, Ymq B2B Lock, Login & Password is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs BeautyAList Login's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: BeautyAList Login at Free, Ymq B2B Lock, Login & Password at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Ymq B2B Lock, Login & Password; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — BeautyAList Login's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Ymq B2B Lock, Login & Password's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: BeautyAList Login audit • Ymq B2B Lock, Login & Password audit
| Keyword | BeautyAList Login | Ymq B2B Lock, Login & Password |
|---|---|---|
| login to see | Not ranked | #10 |
| lock | Not ranked | #13 |
| license | #20 | Not ranked |
| b2b login and access | Not ranked | #23 |
| registration forms | #74 | Not ranked |
Both BeautyAList Login and Ymq B2B Lock, Login & Password offer paid plans only. BeautyAList Login starts at Free; Ymq B2B Lock, Login & Password starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Ymq B2B Lock, Login & Password holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Ymq B2B Lock, Login & Password has the deeper published review base (34 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
BeautyAList Login typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Ymq B2B Lock, Login & Password typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (34 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. BeautyAList Login and Ymq B2B Lock, Login & Password both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from BeautyAList Login" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
