Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Boost AEO & AI search visibility with AI SEO Audit Agent, On-Page SEO Optimizer, and SEO Checklist
| Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | Thunder Page Speed Optimizer | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Boost store speed, AI SEO visibility, and LLMs discovery. Monitor pages and optimize safely.
| Metric | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | Thunder Page Speed Optimizer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4.7k | 75 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 2 | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 62 new | — |
| Languages | 14 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Apr 2020 | May 2022 |
Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer edges out Thunder Page Speed Optimizer on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer at Free plan available, Thunder Page Speed Optimizer at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer has the larger user base (4,665 reviews vs 75), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Thunder Page Speed Optimizer's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Thunder Page Speed Optimizer's 75-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer audit • Thunder Page Speed Optimizer audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | Thunder Page Speed Optimizer |
|---|---|---|
| speed optimization | #9 | #117 |
| page speed | #15 | #12 |
| optimizer | #18 | #2116 |
| speed | #23 | #19 |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
| Signal | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | Thunder Page Speed Optimizer |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (4.7k) | 4.8 ★ (75) |
| Rating distribution | 596% 43% 30% 20% 11% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +8 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +62 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +191 | — |
Both Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer and Thunder Page Speed Optimizer offer paid plans only. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer starts at Free plan available; Thunder Page Speed Optimizer starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 4,665 reviews) compared to Thunder Page Speed Optimizer (4.8★ from 75 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer has the deeper published review base (4,665 vs 75), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4,665 reviews). Thunder Page Speed Optimizer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (75 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Ricky has been very effective at optimizing our store. We increased the speed in just 15 minutes.
Great service from Christian. He is very knowledgeable, attentive, and always willing to help. In no time at all, he was able to help resolve alt text and meta description issues with my website. I appreciate his friendliness, professionalism, and would definitely recommend him to anyone in need of improving their webs
Great app with excellent support! The app is very useful and offers valuable features to improve SEO and store performance. A special thank you to Penelope—she was incredibly fast, responsive, and helpful. She supported me in fixing a few issues and also offered me credits to try out more of the app’s features. Highly
No reviews yet.
Migration support varies by app and category. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer and Thunder Page Speed Optimizer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Thunder Page Speed Optimizer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
