Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Boost AEO & AI search visibility with AI SEO Audit Agent, On-Page SEO Optimizer, and SEO Checklist
| Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | Robots.txt | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Robots.txt Editor allows you to edit your store's Robots.txt file with ease & no theme modifications
| Metric | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | Robots.txt |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4.4k | 5 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 5 | 4 |
| Featured placements | 2 | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 73 new | — |
| Languages | 10 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Apr 2020 | Aug 2022 |
Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer and Robots.txt are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer at Free plan available, Robots.txt at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer has the larger user base (4,423 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Robots.txt's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer audit • Robots.txt audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | Robots.txt |
|---|---|---|
| seo image optimizer | #1 | Not ranked |
| image optimization | #2 | Not ranked |
| image optimizer | #2 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
| Signal | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | Robots.txt |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (4.4k) | 5.0 ★ (5) |
| Rating distribution | 596% 43% 30% 20% 11% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +15 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +73 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +269 | — |
Both Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer and Robots.txt offer paid plans only. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer starts at Free plan available; Robots.txt starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer (4.9★, 4,423 reviews) and Robots.txt (5.0★, 5 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Robots.txt is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer has more onboarding documentation maturity (4,423 reviews vs 5), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (4,423 reviews). Robots.txt aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (5 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Great service, always get a quick response after each inquiry.
Great experience dealing with Christian
very great support tam and really been helpful and quick understanding the issue and provide quick support .
No reviews yet.
Migration support varies by app and category. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer and Robots.txt both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Robots.txt" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
