Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Run the cookie scanner, show the GDPR cookie banners each market needs, and log cookie consent.
| Avada GDPR Cookies Consent | Splitit On‑Site Messaging | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Improve conversion rates with monthly payment white label on-site messaging.
| Metric | Avada GDPR Cookies Consent | Splitit On‑Site Messaging |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 899 | 3 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 5 | 3 |
| Featured placements | 3 | — |
| Languages | 6 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Apr 2022 | Jan 2022 |
Based on the data on this page, Avada GDPR Cookies Consent is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs Splitit On‑Site Messaging's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Avada GDPR Cookies Consent at Free plan available, Splitit On‑Site Messaging at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Avada GDPR Cookies Consent has the larger user base (899 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Splitit On‑Site Messaging's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Avada GDPR Cookies Consent; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Splitit On‑Site Messaging's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Avada GDPR Cookies Consent's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Avada GDPR Cookies Consent audit • Splitit On‑Site Messaging audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Avada GDPR Cookies Consent | Splitit On‑Site Messaging |
|---|---|---|
| cookie consent warnings | #1 | Not ranked |
| cookie consent management | #2 | Not ranked |
| gdpr cookie consent banner | #3 | Not ranked |
| on-site messaging | Not ranked | #7 |
| bnpl | Not ranked | #21 |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
Both Avada GDPR Cookies Consent and Splitit On‑Site Messaging offer paid plans only. Avada GDPR Cookies Consent starts at Free plan available; Splitit On‑Site Messaging starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Avada GDPR Cookies Consent has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 899 reviews) compared to Splitit On‑Site Messaging (3.0★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Avada GDPR Cookies Consent holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Avada GDPR Cookies Consent has the deeper published review base (899 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Avada GDPR Cookies Consent typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (899 reviews). Splitit On‑Site Messaging typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Avada GDPR Cookies Consent and Splitit On‑Site Messaging both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Splitit On‑Site Messaging" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
