Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Transform your store with Make, Model, Year search for an efficient shopping experience.
| PartFinder | DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Revolutionize Product Search and Discovery with Doofinder.
| Metric | PartFinder: Year Make Model | DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 15 | ★ 749 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free trial available | Free to install |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | ★ 5 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Mar 2017 | Jul 2015 |
PartFinder: Year Make Model edges out DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery on rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: PartFinder: Year Make Model at Free trial available, DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery has the larger user base (749 reviews vs 15), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. PartFinder: Year Make Model's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to PartFinder: Year Make Model; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery's 749-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PartFinder: Year Make Model's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: PartFinder: Year Make Model audit • DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery audit
| Keyword | PartFinder | DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery |
|---|---|---|
| search discovery | Not ranked | #5 |
| year make model | #8 | Not ranked |
| product discovery | #16 | Not ranked |
| smart search | Not ranked | #23 |
| model | #24 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Both PartFinder: Year Make Model and DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery offer paid plans only. PartFinder: Year Make Model starts at Free trial available; DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
PartFinder: Year Make Model has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 15 reviews) compared to DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery (4.7★ from 749 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. PartFinder: Year Make Model fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery has more onboarding documentation maturity (749 reviews vs 15), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
PartFinder: Year Make Model typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (15 reviews). DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (749 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. PartFinder: Year Make Model and DOOFINDER ‑ Search & Discovery both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PartFinder: Year Make Model" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
