ARCS History Tracking vs Parkour

Based on the data on this page, Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.9★ vs ARCS History Tracking's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: ARCS History Tracking at Free trial available, Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed has the larger user base (192 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ARCS History Tracking's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ARCS History Tracking's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is ARCS History Tracking or Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed cheaper?

Both ARCS History Tracking and Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed offer paid plans only. ARCS History Tracking starts at Free trial available; Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Should I choose ARCS History Tracking or Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed does carry the larger published review base (192 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, ARCS History Tracking or Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed has the deeper published review base (192 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Shopify App Store merchants?

ARCS History Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (192 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between ARCS History Tracking and Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed?

Migration support varies by app and category. ARCS History Tracking and Parkour: Facebook Pixel & Feed both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ARCS History Tracking" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.