Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Enhance AEO visibility with automatic LLMs.txt generation, crawler control & updates for AI chatbots
| Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt | Citd | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt | Citd |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 385 | 0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | — | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jul 2025 | Jun 2026 |
Based on the data on this page, Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs Citd's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt at Free, Citd at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt has the larger user base (385 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Citd's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Citd's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt audit • Citd audit
| Keyword | Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt | Citd |
|---|---|---|
| optimizer | #1 | Not ranked |
| optimization | #1 | Not ranked |
| ai seo | #10 | Not ranked |
| ai agent | Not ranked | #231 |
No tracked changes.
Both Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt and Citd offer paid plans only. Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt starts at Free; Citd starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Citd is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt has more onboarding documentation maturity (385 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (385 reviews). Citd aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Avada AEO optimizer LLMs.txt and Citd both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Citd" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
