Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Boost AEO & AI search visibility with AI SEO Audit Agent, On-Page SEO Optimizer, and SEO Checklist
| Agentic Flow | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
ChatGPT gets a generated version of your products, not the one you wrote. See it, and fix it.
| Metric | Agentic Flow: ChatGPT AI SEO | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 4.7k |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 2 |
| Review velocity (30d) | — | 60 new |
| Languages | 1 supported | 14 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2026 | Apr 2020 |
Agentic Flow: ChatGPT AI SEO and Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: Agentic Flow: ChatGPT AI SEO at Free plan available, Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer has the larger user base (4,665 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Agentic Flow: ChatGPT AI SEO's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Agentic Flow: ChatGPT AI SEO audit • Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Agentic Flow | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer |
|---|---|---|
| agent ai | #6710 | #128 |
| chatbot ai | #96 | #132 |
| messenger agent | #67 | #164 |
| whatsapp ai agent | #80 | #196 |
| ai support chatbot | #116 | #162 |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
| Signal | Agentic Flow | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 5.0 ★ (3) | 4.9 ★ (4.7k) |
| Rating distribution | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— | 596% 43% 30% 20% 11% |
| Reviews · last 7 days | — | +7 |
| Reviews · last 30 days | — | +60 |
| Reviews · last 90 days | — | +188 |
No reviews yet.
Both Agentic Flow: ChatGPT AI SEO and Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer offer paid plans only. Agentic Flow: ChatGPT AI SEO starts at Free plan available; Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Agentic Flow: ChatGPT AI SEO (5.0★, 3 reviews) and Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer (4.9★, 4,665 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
Agentic Flow: ChatGPT AI SEO holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer has the deeper published review base (4,665 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Agentic Flow: ChatGPT AI SEO typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4,665 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Ottima applicazione. Molto rigorosa. Qualche istruzione più chiara sarebbe la benvenuta per evitare di procedere per tentativi con l'ottimizzazone. Una menzione speciale per l'help desk: Ricky e Sara sono molto efficienti e preparati
AVADA is an absolute lifesaver! Thomas helped me immensely with everything, he was VERY patient and super helpful. He took the time to personally walk me through my SEO checklist step by step. AVADA has a fantastic team overall that is always ready to help you boost your SEO score! I am very happy with them!!! Beucher
Ricky has been very effective at optimizing our store. We increased the speed in just 15 minutes.
Great service from Christian. He is very knowledgeable, attentive, and always willing to help. In no time at all, he was able to help resolve alt text and meta description issues with my website. I appreciate his friendliness, professionalism, and would definitely recommend him to anyone in need of improving their webs
Migration support varies by app and category. Agentic Flow: ChatGPT AI SEO and Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Agentic Flow: ChatGPT AI SEO" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
