Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
(ACF) Metafields Custom Fields for reusable product content like Size Charts, FAQs & Brand Bios.
| Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) | FieldsRaven | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Create custom forms and storefront features that capture and route data—no custom backend required.
| Metric | Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) | FieldsRaven |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 167 | 4 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Languages | 20 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2016 | Feb 2022 |
FieldsRaven edges out Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) at Free plan available, FieldsRaven at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) has the larger user base (167 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. FieldsRaven's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to FieldsRaven; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF)'s 167-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than FieldsRaven's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) audit • FieldsRaven audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) | FieldsRaven |
|---|---|---|
| fields | #2 | Not ranked |
| metafields | #3 | Not ranked |
| metafield | #3 | Not ranked |
| product registration | Not ranked | #8 |
| quizzes | Not ranked | #122 |
Both Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) and FieldsRaven offer paid plans only. Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) starts at Free plan available; FieldsRaven starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
FieldsRaven has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) (4.8★ from 167 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
FieldsRaven holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) has the deeper published review base (167 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (167 reviews). FieldsRaven typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) and FieldsRaven both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from FieldsRaven" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.