Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Short URL UTM tracking + A/B testing to optimize ads, boost revenue, and increase conversions!
| ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track | Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Mold your existing store for wholesale & B2B buyers by offering them unlimited B2B catalogs
| Metric | ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track | Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.4 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 4 | ★ 274 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 1 |
| Review velocity (30d) | — | 21 new |
| Languages | 1 supported | 6 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2025 | Nov 2024 |
Based on the data on this page, Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track's 3.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track at Free plan available, Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing has the larger user base (274 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track audit • Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track | Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing |
|---|---|---|
| b2b wholesale pricing | Not ranked | #1 |
| pricing optimization | Not ranked | #3 |
| pricing | Not ranked | #4 |
Not featured in any section recently.
| Signal | ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track | Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 3.4 ★ (4) | 5.0 ★ (274) |
| Rating distribution | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— | 598% 42% 30% 20% 10% |
| Reviews · last 7 days | — | +5 |
| Reviews · last 30 days | — | +21 |
| Reviews · last 90 days | — | +49 |
No reviews yet.
Both ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track and Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing offer paid plans only. ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track starts at Free plan available; Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 274 reviews) compared to ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track (3.4★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing has the deeper published review base (274 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (274 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
great help and service
This app is amazing for merchants who are looking to improve their wholesale processes. The way I would handle wholesale prior was very inconvenient, so an easy to implement app was just what I was looking for. I had some issues with the configuration, and the owner of the app was able to hop on a chat and video share
Vraiment un bon service client. D'une aide précieuse.
We use Clay to manage different wholesale prices for customers across various European countries, handled via specific customer tiers and multiple currencies. While there are other solutions on the market, Clay stands out because of its clean, intuitive interface and the caliber of its team.The app handles the complex
Great app, very fast and competent support. ****** App works perfectly
Migration support varies by app and category. ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track and Clay • B2B Wholesale Pricing both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ABPilot AB Testing | UTM Track" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
