Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Go beyond themes—create conversion-ready landing & product pages fast, no coding required.
| A&A Virtual Try‑On | PageFly Landing Page Builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
AI virtual try-on lets shoppers see how dresses and garments look on them, boosting confidence.
| Metric | A&A Virtual Try‑On | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 5.6k |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free trial available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 7 |
| Review velocity (30d) | — | 27 new |
| Languages | 1 supported | 9 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2026 | Sep 2017 |
Based on the data on this page, PageFly Landing Page Builder is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.9★ vs A&A Virtual Try‑On's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: A&A Virtual Try‑On at Free trial available, PageFly Landing Page Builder at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. PageFly Landing Page Builder has the larger user base (5,639 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. A&A Virtual Try‑On's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to PageFly Landing Page Builder; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — A&A Virtual Try‑On's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PageFly Landing Page Builder's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: A&A Virtual Try‑On audit • PageFly Landing Page Builder audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | A&A Virtual Try‑On | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| page | Not ranked | #1 |
| landing pages | Not ranked | #2 |
| landing | Not ranked | #3 |
| touchtry virtual try | #7 | Not ranked |
| touchtry virtual | #14 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
| Signal | A&A Virtual Try‑On | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.2 ★ (5) | 4.9 ★ (5.6k) |
| Rating distribution | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— | 593% 42% 31% 21% 13% |
| Reviews · last 7 days | — | +6 |
| Reviews · last 30 days | — | +27 |
| Reviews · last 90 days | — | +110 |
No reviews yet.
Both A&A Virtual Try‑On and PageFly Landing Page Builder offer paid plans only. A&A Virtual Try‑On starts at Free trial available; PageFly Landing Page Builder starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
PageFly Landing Page Builder has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 5,639 reviews) compared to A&A Virtual Try‑On (4.2★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. A&A Virtual Try‑On fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; PageFly Landing Page Builder is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. PageFly Landing Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,639 reviews vs 5), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
A&A Virtual Try‑On typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (5 reviews). PageFly Landing Page Builder aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (5,639 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
I have been using the Pagefly app since 2020 but haven't needed to use the chat function until today (July 2026). I wanted to make a change on a page but noticed that all of my pages are now labeled "Legacy" and the edit function is not available. Yakub was very helpful in explaining the change and providing a video on
Nice service. Can get back to me in a timely when I have questions
Shady, shady app, i uninstalled but their tracking code was still injected.
You guys always figure it out! Thanks so much!
Migration support varies by app and category. A&A Virtual Try‑On and PageFly Landing Page Builder both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from A&A Virtual Try‑On" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
