Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Advanced Field History Tracker (AFHT) — your ultimate solution for comprehensive field history tracking and seamless data restoration within Salesforce. Unlike standard tracking features, AFHT empowers you to monitor and manage changes to your data.
| Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) | ISVapp App Analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
ISVapp is the central toolbox for Salesforce ISV & OEM partner: Reduce churn, increase renewals, identify upsell potential, close more deals. ISVapp is the only plug & play solution for the AppExchange AppAnalytics API and provides deep product insights.
| Metric | Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) | ISVapp App Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 41 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | freemium | paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 2 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 1 | ★ 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2024 | Apr 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, ISVapp App Analytics is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native)'s 2.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) offers a free tier (freemium) while ISVapp App Analytics starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to ISVapp App Analytics; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native)'s 1-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ISVapp App Analytics's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) audit • ISVapp App Analytics audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) | ISVapp App Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| advance | #6 | Not ranked |
| field history | #7 | Not ranked |
| field history tracking | #10 | Not ranked |
| survey app | Not ranked | #113 |
| sign app | Not ranked | #120 |
Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). ISVapp App Analytics starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
ISVapp App Analytics has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 41 reviews) compared to Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) (2.0★ from 1 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
ISVapp App Analytics holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 2.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. ISVapp App Analytics has the deeper published review base (41 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). ISVapp App Analytics typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (41 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native) and ISVapp App Analytics both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Track & Restore Fields History with Advance Field History Tracker (100% Native)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.