Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Start with a user, not a permission set. Pick anyone in your org, drill into any app, and see every object, field, and record they can access — with the exact profile, permission set, or sharing rule that granted it. 100% native. Read-only.
| Who Sees What | PolicyMap for Salesforce | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated |
Bring neighborhood-level data and maps into Salesforce to streamline decision-making, compliance, reporting, and grant-making.
| Metric | Who Sees What — User Access, Field Security & Record Visibility Explorer | PolicyMap for Salesforce |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 5 | ★ 6 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2026 | Aug 2026 |
On pricing, Who Sees What — User Access, Field Security & Record Visibility Explorer offers a free tier (free) while PolicyMap for Salesforce starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Who Sees What — User Access, Field Security & Record Visibility Explorer audit • PolicyMap for Salesforce audit
| — |
| — |
| Keyword | Who Sees What | PolicyMap for Salesforce |
|---|---|---|
| reporting and grant-making | Not ranked | #1 |
| neighborhood-level data | Not ranked | #1 |
| bring neighborhood-level data | Not ranked | #1 |
| and access | #11 | Not ranked |
Who Sees What — User Access, Field Security & Record Visibility Explorer is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). PolicyMap for Salesforce starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot recommend one over the other from published marketplace data: the Salesforce AppExchange does not expose a rating or review base that separates them. Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown, and compare against your own requirements rather than a headline number.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly, and the Salesforce AppExchange publishes no review base that would let us infer it for these two — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Who Sees What — User Access, Field Security & Record Visibility Explorer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). PolicyMap for Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Who Sees What — User Access, Field Security & Record Visibility Explorer and PolicyMap for Salesforce both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PolicyMap for Salesforce" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.