Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Geopointe | External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Give customers, partners and external users seamless access to any application using their Salesforce record. Turn Contacts, Accounts, Leads and Custom Objects into digital identities and enable Salesforce SSO, passwordless login, CIAM and federated auth.
| Metric | Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation | External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 931 | 1 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 10 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | May 2010 | Aug 2026 |
External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects edges out Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects offers a free tier (free) while Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the larger user base (931 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation's 931-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation audit • External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Geopointe | External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects |
|---|---|---|
| wordpress | #11 | #8 |
No tracked changes.
External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation (4.9★ from 931 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation has the deeper published review base (931 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (931 reviews). External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Geopointe: Mapping, Territory Management, Maps, Routing & Analytics, Geolocation and External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from External Identity Provider for Salesforce Contacts, Accounts & Custom Objects" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
