Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Generates Barcode/QR code for any input value. Supports variety of 1D as well as 2D formats. Solution developed on Salesforce platform using LWC components. Adjust the barcode size and do printing.
| TS Barcode | Chargent Payment Processing | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
• PCI Compliant Credit Card & ACH Payments • Automated & Compliant Card Surcharging • Recurring Billing, Subscriptions Payments, & Automatic Payment Recovery • Self-Service Payments in Experience Cloud • 30+ Direct Payment Gateway Integrations
| Metric | TS Barcode | Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.0 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 529 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | — | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 1 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Dec 2023 | Mar 2009 |
Based on the data on this page, Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange merchants — 4.9★ vs TS Barcode's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, TS Barcode offers a free tier (free) while Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments starts at paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has the larger user base (529 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. TS Barcode's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — TS Barcode's 1-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: TS Barcode audit • Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | TS Barcode | Chargent Payment Processing |
|---|---|---|
| powerful flexible | Not ranked | #1 |
| processing | Not ranked | #1 |
| quickly | Not ranked | #1 |
| barcode | #7 | Not ranked |
| barcode labels | #11 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
TS Barcode is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 529 reviews) compared to TS Barcode (3.0★ from 1 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. TS Barcode fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has more onboarding documentation maturity (529 reviews vs 1), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
TS Barcode typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1 reviews). Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (529 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. TS Barcode and Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from TS Barcode" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
